← New Search ↗ Social Card

Daniel Walters Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-03-28 Country: Canada
Cornell
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Halifax Mooseheads QMJHL 63 3 8 11 0.175 0.0858 0.0943 0.4661 0.5123
2025-26 Halifax Mooseheads QMJHL 63 15 15 30 0.476 0.2340 0.2462 1.2713 1.3373
2026-27 Halifax Mooseheads QMJHL 7 1 1 2 0.286 0.1404 0.1404 0.7627 0.7627
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33259
Forward overall
#604
Forward born in 2008
#987
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Cornell Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2018-19
0.10
actual FR PPG at Cornell
NE-Prep 2021-22
1.00
actual FR PPG at Cornell
USHL 2024-25
0.00
actual FR PPG at Cornell
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.44
actual FR PPG at Cornell

D2/3 Comparables

Bowdoin · 2022-23
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2021-22
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Assumption · 2020-21
0.552 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.