IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Daniel Walters Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-03-28 Country: Canada
Cornell
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Halifax Mooseheads QMJHL 63 3 8 11 0.175 0.0858 0.0943 0.4662 0.5124
2025-26 Halifax Mooseheads QMJHL 63 15 15 30 0.476 0.2340 0.2462 1.2716 1.3376
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32826
Forward overall
#527
Forward born in 2008
#972
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Polino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ RPI (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Luke Stork
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Garrett Gamez
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Providence (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alex Talcott
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Michigan
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Andrew Oglevie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Cornell Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Corey Hoffman
EHL 2013-14
0.00
actual FR PPG at Cornell
Anthony Angello
USHL 2013-14
0.71
actual FR PPG at Cornell
Nick DeSantis
NAHL 2019-20
0.67
actual FR PPG at Cornell
Ryan Walsh
NE-Prep 2021-22
1.00
actual FR PPG at Cornell

D2/3 Comparables

Nate Pionk
St. Scholastica · 2014-15
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Cooper
King's · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryce Grandbois
Worcester State · 2022-23
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.