IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Allie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-09-02 Country: Canada
St. Lawrence
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Gatineau Olympiques QMJHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2025-26 Gatineau Olympiques QMJHL 34 6 6 12 0.353 0.1734 0.1775 0.9423 0.9644
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19306
Forward overall
#570
Forward born in 2007
#626
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Zach Aston-Reese
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG

St. Lawrence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Cayden Casey
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.31
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
Nicholas Beneteau
BCHL 2021-22
0.22
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
Jake Bernadet
NCDC 2021-22
0.07
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
Isaac Tremblay
BCHL 2022-23
0.36
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence

D2/3 Comparables

Joel Covelli
Colby · 2002-03
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Magagna
SUNY Oswego · 2001-02
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Braydon Barker
Concordia · 2014-15
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.