IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Allie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-09-02 Country: Canada
St. Lawrence
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Gatineau Olympiques QMJHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2025-26 Gatineau Olympiques QMJHL 34 6 6 12 0.353 0.1734 0.1775 0.9421 0.9642
2026-27 Gatineau Olympiques QMJHL 5 0 2 2 0.400 0.1965 0.1965 1.0678 1.0678
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19605
Forward overall
#608
Forward born in 2007
#643
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Reuschlein
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

St. Lawrence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Cayden Casey
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.31
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
Jake Bernadet
BCHL 2022-23
0.07
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
Nick Trela
NAHL 2018-19
0.47
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
Sam LeDrew
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.56
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence

D2/3 Comparables

Joel Covelli
Colby · 2003-04
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jacob Ratcliffe
Westfield State · 2016-17
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Wheeler
St. Norbert · 2005-06
0.903 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.