IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Xavier Cormier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-12-18 Country: Canada
New Hampshire
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Drummondville Voltigeurs QMJHL 42 6 11 17 0.405 0.1989 0.2164 1.0809 1.1762
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6936
Defenseman overall
#446
Defenseman born in 2008
#852
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

R.J. Gicewicz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Josh Jacobs
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Morrison
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Northland
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Mark Friedman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Willett
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ RIT (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

New Hampshire Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Zach Hahn
NE-Prep 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
Ryan Philbrick
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.23
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
Damien Carfagna
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.46
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
Conner de Haro
NAHL 2022-23
0.30
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Moodie
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alexei Filimonov
Fitchburg State · 2021-22
1.560 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
John Barrett
Wilkes · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.