← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Mazzola Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2009-04-24 Country: USA
Quinnipiac
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Seacoast Performance Academy 14U 14u-aaa 67 7 38 45 0.672 — — — —
2024-25 Seacoast Performance Academy 15U 15u-aaa 51 10 41 51 1.000 — — — —
2025-26 Seacoast Performance Academy 16U"A" 16u-aaa 61 17 77 94 1.541 — — — —
2026-27 Sherbrooke Phoenix QMJHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0983 0.0983 0.5339 0.5339
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
68%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Boston College (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Miami (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Quinnipiac Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
USHL 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
NE-Prep 2020-21
0.09
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac

D2/3 Comparables

Lake Forest · 2007-08
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
University of New England · 2000-01
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2000-01
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.