IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Burke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-05-18 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Trinity
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Westminster NE-Prep 26 14 14 28 1.077 0.2166 0.2166 0.4925 0.4925
2023-24 Westminster NE-Prep 23 9 9 18 0.783 0.1574 0.1574 0.3579 0.3579
2024-25 Westminster NE-Prep 28 22 19 41 1.464 0.2945 0.2945 0.6696 0.6696
2025-26 Cape Breton Eagles QMJHL 20 0 7 7 0.350 0.1720 0.1649 0.9344 0.8959
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20583
Forward overall
#915
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Trinity Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Lucas Michaud
0.89
actual FR PPG at Trinity
Jax Murray
0.88
actual FR PPG at Trinity
Timothy Weinstein
3.00
actual FR PPG at Trinity
Ty Broad
0.87
actual FR PPG at Trinity

D2/3 Comparables

Rob Sgarbossa
SUNY Morrisville · 2005-06
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Manning
Worcester State · 2015-16
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
David Italiano
Williams · 2012-13
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.