IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Sercerchi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-02-18 Country: Canada
New Hampshire
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Val-d'Or Foreurs QMJHL 43 0 3 3 0.070 0.0343 0.0376 0.1864 0.2044
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#60951
Forward overall
#352
Forward born in 2009
#2115
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

Jared Fiegl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Cornell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Michael Booth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Boston College (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sam Kauppila
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Sheehy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Alex Tuch
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Boston College (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong
NCAAe PPG

New Hampshire Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Connor Sweeney
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
Jason Siedem
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.12
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
Liam Devlin
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.47
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
Jake Dunlap
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.25
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Tait
University of New England · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Jobb
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2005-06
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
John Gutt
Utica · 2017-18
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.