← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Sercerchi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-02-18 Country: Canada
New Hampshire
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Val-d'Or Foreurs QMJHL 43 0 3 3 0.070 0.0343 0.0376 0.1863 0.2043
2026-27 Val-d'Or Foreurs QMJHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.2457 0.2457 1.3348 1.3348
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#61521
Forward overall
#423
Forward born in 2009
#2120
in QMJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Providence (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Michigan
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

New Hampshire Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2019-20
0.20
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
USPHL-Premier-Classic 2014-15
0.56
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
MHL-RU 2020-21
0.24
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2014-15
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2022-23
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
King's · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.