IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Perrault Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-01-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.1184 0.1184 0.3499 0.3499
2021-22 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 59 1 16 17 0.288 0.1023 0.1053 0.3025 0.3115
2022-23 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 60 5 16 21 0.350 0.1243 0.1219 3.7219 3.2088
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SO 24 0 3 3 0.125
2024-25 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC — 27 3 7 10 0.370
2023-24 Augustana D1 CCHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13011
Defenseman overall
#2563
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.