IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mark Mitera Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1987-10-22 Country: USA
2006 · Round 1, Pick #19  ·  Anaheim Ducks Anaheim Ducks
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 USNTDP Juniors NAHL 43 2 13 15 0.349 0.1281 0.1470 0.3682 0.4226
2004-05 USNTDP Juniors NAHL 16 2 6 8 0.500 0.1837 0.2017 0.5278 0.5795
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Michigan D1 BigTen SR 8 1 2 3 0.375
2007-08 Michigan D1 BigTen JR 43 2 21 23 0.535
2006-07 Michigan D1 BigTen SO 41 1 17 18 0.439
2005-06 Michigan D1 BigTen FR 39 0 10 10 0.256
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2005-06 · Michigan
+51.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8464
Defenseman overall
#1035
Defenseman born in 1987
#3049
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Morrison
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Northland
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
R.J. Gicewicz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Keaton Thompson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Phil Beaulieu
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Corey Schueneman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josiah Roen
Bethel · 2014-15
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Graham Fallon
SUNY Cortland · 2003-04
0.917 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Pedersen
St. Olaf · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.