← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joey Nigro Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-04-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 39 6 6 12 0.308 0.1130 0.1209 0.3248 0.3476
2004-05 Powell River Kings BCHL 11 2 1 3 0.273 0.1051 0.1073 0.3969 0.4052
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 7 1 4 5 0.714
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.71
2006-07 · St. Scholastica
+640.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#44569
Forward overall
#1452
Forward born in 1986

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Becker · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Stonehill · 2019-20
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2019-20
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.