← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shane Kavanagh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-01-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 51 7 5 12 0.235 0.1388 0.1367 0.7067 0.6958
2014-15 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 47 10 11 21 0.447 0.2636 0.2466 1.3419 1.2553
2015-16 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 58 16 23 39 0.672 0.3966 0.3526 2.0195 1.7954
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Providence D1 HockeyEast SR 34 2 4 6 0.176
2018-19 Providence D1 HockeyEast JR 35 1 0 1 0.029
2017-18 Providence D1 HockeyEast SO 31 2 3 5 0.161
2016-17 Providence D1 HockeyEast FR 30 3 1 4 0.133
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2016-17 · Providence
-49.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15355
Forward overall
#593
Forward born in 1995
#1475
in USHL

D1 Comparables

WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2006-07
1.586 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2023-24
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.