← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Chiasson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-06-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Peterborough Liftlock Stars OJHL 40 0 6 6 0.150 0.0451 0.0503 0.1027 0.1145
2011-12 Peterborough Liftlock Stars OJHL 41 0 6 6 0.146 0.0439 0.0470 0.1001 0.1071
2012-13 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 49 1 9 10 0.204 0.0809 0.0844 0.2143 0.2236
2013-14 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 26 0 1 1 0.038 0.0237 0.0227 0.1134 0.1086
2014-15 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 46 7 10 17 0.370 0.1464 0.1377 0.3880 0.3650
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SO 11 0 2 2 0.182
2015-16 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 FR 20 1 2 3 0.150
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2015-16 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+73.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18271
Defenseman overall
#1989
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marian · 2017-18
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Amherst · 2021-22
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2013-14
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.