← New Search ↗ Social Card

Parker Colley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-06-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 57 4 17 21 0.368 0.1434 0.1479 0.5372 0.5540
2016-17 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 56 12 15 27 0.482 0.1876 0.1839 0.7030 0.6891
2017-18 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 58 16 25 41 0.707 0.2751 0.2564 1.0309 0.9610
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Marian D3 NCHA SR 27 7 18 25 0.926
2020-21 Marian D3 NCHA JR 19 8 10 18 0.947
2019-20 Marian D3 NCHA SO 28 8 16 24 0.857
2018-19 Marian D3 NCHA FR 23 3 9 12 0.522
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2018-19 · Marian
+168.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18107
Forward overall
#745
Forward born in 1997
#1597
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2018-19
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2021-22
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2008-09
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.