IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Miguel Fidler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-03-17 Country: USA
2014 · Round 5, Pick #143  ·  Florida Panthers Florida Panthers
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 — USHL 60 7 20 27 0.450 0.2655 0.2642 1.3515 1.3451
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Ohio State D1 BigTen SR 30 1 4 5 0.167
2018-19 Ohio State D1 BigTen JR 22 1 4 5 0.227
2017-18 Ohio State D1 BigTen — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Ohio State D1 BigTen SO 34 4 6 10 0.294
2015-16 Ohio State D1 BigTen FR 20 3 4 7 0.350
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2015-16 · Ohio State
+54.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18407
Forward overall
#720
Forward born in 1996
#1794
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Mackenzie MacEachern
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brian Morgan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Maine (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Aman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jack Rowe
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Arizona State (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy DeVito
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jon Daigle
Marian · 2000-01
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Cooper
King's · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Cuthrell
Nichols · 2012-13
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.