IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Rodriguez Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-12-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 51 6 11 17 0.333 0.1966 0.1932 0.9978 0.9804
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Augsburg D1 MIAC SR 26 21 19 40 1.538
2018-19 Augsburg D3 MIAC SR 26 21 19 40 1.538
2017-18 Augsburg D3 MIAC JR 28 7 12 19 0.679
2016-17 RPI D1 ECAC SO 20 1 0 1 0.050
2015-16 RPI D1 ECAC FR 26 3 5 8 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2015-16 · RPI
+86.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27512
Forward overall
#1074
Forward born in 1995
#2617
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kenny Gillespie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brian Sanzone
Colby · 2016-17
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Leone
Utica · 2006-07
1.462 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitchell Herlihey
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.