IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chandler Lindstrand Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-02-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 59 5 5 10 0.170 0.1000 0.0992 0.5086 0.5045
2015-16 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 59 2 9 11 0.186 0.1100 0.1040 0.5593 0.5288
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Yale D1 ECAC SR 32 1 2 3 0.094
2018-19 Yale D1 ECAC JR 27 2 9 11 0.407
2017-18 Yale D1 ECAC SO 21 0 2 2 0.095
2016-17 Yale D1 ECAC FR 21 1 5 6 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2016-17 · Yale
+196.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15745
Defenseman overall
#2048
Defenseman born in 1996
#3976
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sébastien Poirier
Westfield State · 2009-10
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeffrey Gratz
Framingham State · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Oldcorn
Manhattanville · 2000-01
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.