IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Robby Fosdick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-08-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Madison Capitols USHL 42 1 4 5 0.119 0.0702 0.0714 0.3574 0.3635
2015-16 Madison Capitols USHL 50 0 2 2 0.040 0.0236 0.0229 0.1201 0.1166
2016-17 Madison Capitols USHL 60 2 8 10 0.167 0.0983 0.0904 0.5007 0.4604
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA — 34 0 2 2 0.059
2017-18 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA — 34 1 3 4 0.118
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2017-18 · Northern Michigan
+96.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22072
Defenseman overall
#2530
Defenseman born in 1996
#4057
in USHL

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ethan Byrne
St. Norbert · 2023-24
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Araujo
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2017-18
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alec Skar
Wisconsin-Stout · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.