IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charlie Raith Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-04-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Chicago Steel USHL 39 0 5 5 0.128 0.0756 0.0795 0.3847 0.4044
2015-16 — USHL 40 0 5 5 0.125 0.0737 0.0741 0.3751 0.3769
2016-17 Central Illinois Flying Aces USHL 41 1 5 6 0.146 0.0863 0.0823 0.4390 0.4187
2017-18 Central Illinois Flying Aces USHL 49 3 18 21 0.429 0.2528 0.2286 1.2861 1.1628
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Notre Dame D1 BigTen — 14 0 1 1 0.071
2020-21 Notre Dame D1 BigTen JR 25 0 1 1 0.040
2019-20 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SO 36 2 1 3 0.083
2018-19 Notre Dame D1 BigTen — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9473
Defenseman overall
#1647
Defenseman born in 1997
#3366
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brady Fleurent
University of New England · 2014-15
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Galati
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
1.241 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Herdt
Concordia · 2015-16
1.273 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.