IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Sundquist Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-02-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 42 4 5 9 0.214 0.1365 0.1356 0.6422 0.6382
2016-17 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 44 13 17 30 0.682 0.2654 0.2555 0.9943 0.9572
2017-18 Surrey Eagles BCHL 56 5 19 24 0.429 0.1668 0.1526 0.6250 0.5717
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Trinity D3 NESCAC SR 23 2 2 4 0.174
2020-21 Trinity D3 NESCAC JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Trinity D3 NESCAC SO 18 1 2 3 0.167
2018-19 Trinity D3 NESCAC FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
40%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21317
Forward overall
#897
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sean Burke
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2003-04
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Joshua Racek
Northland · 2014-15
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nolan Zotter
Canton · 2023-24
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.