← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brady Ferner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-08-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 49 1 4 5 0.102 0.0375 0.0412 0.1077 0.1184
2015-16 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 35 0 6 6 0.171 0.1011 0.1032 0.5148 0.5257
2016-17 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 51 2 8 10 0.196 0.1157 0.1122 0.5890 0.5713
2017-18 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 60 2 17 19 0.317 0.1868 0.1719 0.9512 0.8755
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 North Dakota D1 NCHC 29 0 4 4 0.138
2020-21 RPI D1 ECAC 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 RPI D1 ECAC SO 34 2 6 8 0.235
2019-20 Rensselaer D1 SO 34 2 6 8 0.235
2018-19 RPI D1 ECAC FR 36 2 2 4 0.111
2018-19 Rensselaer D1 FR 36 2 2 4 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2018-19 · RPI
-20.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10719
Defenseman overall
#1749
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2005-06
1.033 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.