IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Garrett Klee Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-04-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Madison Capitols USHL 41 1 2 3 0.073 0.0432 0.0455 0.2198 0.2313
2016-17 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 59 10 9 19 0.322 0.1899 0.1901 0.9671 0.9682
2017-18 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 60 7 11 18 0.300 0.1770 0.1684 0.9010 0.8573
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA SR 33 1 4 5 0.151
2020-21 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA JR 26 3 0 3 0.115
2019-20 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA SO 37 4 4 8 0.216
2018-19 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA FR 38 2 4 6 0.158
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2018-19 · Northern Michigan
+4.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35556
Forward overall
#1789
Forward born in 1998
#3223
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shane Baker
Skidmore · 2023-24
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
A.J. Tucker
St. Scholastica · 2003-04
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Williams
Marian · 2007-08
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.