IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dominic Dockery Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-01-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier-Classic 39 10 16 26 0.667 0.1871 0.1942 0.5481 0.5690
2016-17 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 60 3 13 16 0.267 0.1573 0.1475 0.8003 0.7504
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Maine D1 HockeyEast — 17 0 1 1 0.059
2020-21 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast SR 18 1 6 7 0.389
2019-20 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast JR 29 1 6 7 0.241
2018-19 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast SO 33 1 4 5 0.151
2017-18 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast FR 28 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#8829
Defenseman overall
#1574
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Blake Kashark
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
George Thurston
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Timothy Weinstein
Trinity · 2016-17
3.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.