← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Carpenter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-08-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Omaha Lancers USHL 3 1 0 1 0.333 0.1966 0.2202 1.0010 1.1212
2017-18 Omaha Lancers USHL 59 7 6 13 0.220 0.1300 0.1392 0.6616 0.7082
2018-19 Omaha Lancers USHL 62 11 13 24 0.387 0.2284 0.2327 1.1626 1.1845
2019-20 Chicago Steel USHL 49 10 17 27 0.551 0.3250 0.3250 1.6549 1.6549
2020-21 Omaha Lancers USHL 50 10 11 21 0.420 0.2478 0.2478 1.2614 1.2614
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Notre Dame D1 BigTen 38 1 1 2 0.053
2023-24 Notre Dame D1 BigTen 33 5 4 9 0.273
2022-23 Notre Dame D1 BigTen 30 3 4 7 0.233
2021-22 Notre Dame D1 BigTen 6 1 0 1 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2021-22 · Notre Dame
-0.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18131
Forward overall
#813
Forward born in 2000
#1770
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Vermont (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2011-12
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2002-03
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2000-01
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.