IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bobby Kuehl Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1985-09-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 55 2 7 9 0.164 0.0581 0.0577 0.1726 0.1713
2005-06 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 58 1 6 7 0.121 0.0429 0.0404 0.1273 0.1200
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SR 24 1 4 5 0.208
2009-10 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2008-09 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC JR 31 2 5 7 0.226
2007-08 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SO 30 1 8 9 0.300
2006-07 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC FR 27 3 14 17 0.630
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.63
2006-07 · Wisconsin-Stout
+1308.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25193
Defenseman overall
#1782
Defenseman born in 1985
#6529
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

John Goldowski
Endicott · 2021-22
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Sawicky
Bethel · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Rose
Wesleyan · 2016-17
0.160 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.