IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Conor McCahill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-11-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 50 2 4 6 0.120 0.0446 0.0447 0.1271 0.1274
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Salve Regina D3 — SR 22 8 8 16 0.727
2007-08 Salve Regina D3 — JR 24 10 9 19 0.792
2006-07 Salve Regina D3 — SO 24 5 6 11 0.458
2005-06 Salve Regina D3 — FR 23 4 7 11 0.478
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2005-06 · Salve Regina
+1148.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#53690
Forward overall
#1686
Forward born in 1985
#6720
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Lemirande
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Miami (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Erik Baskin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Air Force (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Thamert
Chatham · 2015-16
0.174 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Long
Fredonia · 2011-12
0.632 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Wild
Post · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.