IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dustin Partacz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-07-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Marquette Rangers NAHL 58 3 6 9 0.155 0.0551 0.0572 0.1637 0.1699
2007-08 Marquette Rangers NAHL 51 4 9 13 0.255 0.0906 0.0896 0.2689 0.2659
2008-09 Marquette Rangers NAHL 53 11 8 19 0.358 0.1274 0.1196 0.3781 0.3551
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Concordia D3 MIAC — 2 0 0 0 0.000
2010-11 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2009-10 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA FR 22 7 3 10 0.455
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2009-10 · Concordia (WI)
+393.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#44542
Forward overall
#1473
Forward born in 1988
#4901
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mark Sullivan
SUNY Potsdam · 2007-08
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Devyn Orpana
Adrian · 2021-22
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Bourhas
Colby · 2018-19
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.