IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Filip Starzynski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-01-26 Country: Poland
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0525 0.0563 0.1508 0.1617
2011-12 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 43 5 5 10 0.233 0.0855 0.0875 0.2455 0.2512
2012-13 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 53 4 19 23 0.434 0.1595 0.1552 0.4581 0.4457
2013-14 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 43 13 24 37 0.861 0.3161 0.2917 0.9083 0.8382
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA SR 35 2 1 3 0.086
2016-17 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA JR 30 3 0 3 0.100
2015-16 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA SO 36 1 5 6 0.167
2014-15 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#23441
Forward overall
#814
Forward born in 1993
#1782
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colin MacCormack
Bowdoin · 2005-06
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
J.B. Baker
Nichols · 2015-16
1.482 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Dale Lupul
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
0.759 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.