IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Paras Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-06-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 — NAHL 41 3 2 5 0.122 0.0448 0.0444 0.1288 0.1278
2012-13 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 55 2 10 12 0.218 0.0802 0.0755 0.2303 0.2169
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Hamline D3 MIAC — 25 1 2 3 0.120
2015-16 Hamline D3 MIAC — 13 0 1 1 0.077
2014-15 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen — 6 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen — 9 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#21904
Defenseman overall
#2055
Defenseman born in 1992
#6106
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Braeden McKinnon
Anna Maria · 2021-22
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Jarrell
Elmira · 2007-08
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Pennell
Concordia · 2011-12
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.