IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stephen Inman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-12-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 32 1 3 4 0.125 0.0459 0.0445 0.1319 0.1278
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 St. Michael's College D2 — SR 27 0 7 7 0.259
2015-16 St. Michael's College D2 — JR 23 0 1 1 0.043
2014-15 St. Michael's College D2 — SO 26 2 8 10 0.385
2013-14 St. Michael's College D2 — FR 24 4 6 10 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2013-14 · St. Michael's College
+892.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23416
Defenseman overall
#2137
Defenseman born in 1992
#6328
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ethan Rist
Worcester State · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Hervey
Adrian · 2012-13
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Lachaine
Suffolk · 2018-19
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.