| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Salmon Arm Silverbacks | BCHL | 41 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 0.317 | 0.1222 | 0.1255 | 0.4615 | 0.4741 |
| 2013-14 | Rio Grande Valley Killer Bees | NAHL | 59 | 12 | 25 | 37 | 0.627 | 0.2304 | 0.2285 | 0.6619 | 0.6564 |
| 2014-15 | Rio Grande Valley Killer Bees | NAHL | 60 | 13 | 32 | 45 | 0.750 | 0.2756 | 0.2589 | 0.7916 | 0.7435 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Arizona State | D1 | NCHC | SR | 34 | 7 | 16 | 23 | 0.676 |
| 2017-18 | Arizona State | D1 | NCHC | JR | 33 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 0.455 |
| 2016-17 | Arizona State | D1 | NCHC | SO | 32 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 0.656 |
| 2015-16 | Arizona State | D1 | NCHC | FR | 28 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.250 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.