← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Croston Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-06-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 41 4 9 13 0.317 0.1222 0.1255 0.4615 0.4741
2013-14 Rio Grande Valley Killer Bees NAHL 59 12 25 37 0.627 0.2304 0.2285 0.6619 0.6564
2014-15 Rio Grande Valley Killer Bees NAHL 60 13 32 45 0.750 0.2756 0.2589 0.7916 0.7435
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Arizona State D1 NCHC SR 34 7 16 23 0.676
2017-18 Arizona State D1 NCHC JR 33 6 9 15 0.455
2016-17 Arizona State D1 NCHC SO 32 10 11 21 0.656
2015-16 Arizona State D1 NCHC FR 28 2 5 7 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2015-16 · Arizona State
+18.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22134
Forward overall
#860
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Keene State · 2023-24
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2024-25
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Augsburg · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.