IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jason Lem Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-11-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 57 2 6 8 0.140 0.0516 0.0548 0.1482 0.1573
2014-15 — NAHL 47 0 1 1 0.021 0.0078 0.0079 0.0225 0.0227
2015-16 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 18 1 1 2 0.111 0.0408 0.0393 0.1173 0.1131
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Skidmore D1 SUNYAC SR 6 1 0 1 0.167
2019-20 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SR 6 1 0 1 0.167
2018-19 Skidmore D1 SUNYAC JR 13 0 1 1 0.077
2018-19 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC JR 13 0 1 1 0.077
2017-18 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC SO 9 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC FR 15 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#28741
Defenseman overall
#2829
Defenseman born in 1995
#6857
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryne Bodger
St. Scholastica · 2009-10
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon McReynolds
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2016-17
0.091 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Johnson
Gustavus Adolphus · 2018-19
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.