| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Wenatchee Wild | BCHL | 50 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 0.280 | 0.1079 | 0.1147 | 0.4080 | 0.4338 |
| 2016-17 | — | NAHL | 52 | 14 | 15 | 29 | 0.558 | 0.1981 | 0.2027 | 0.5855 | 0.5990 |
| 2017-18 | Omaha Lancers | USHL | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.100 | 0.0590 | 0.0556 | 0.2946 | 0.2776 |
| 2018-19 | Springfield Jr. Blues | NAHL | 59 | 30 | 50 | 80 | 1.356 | 0.4816 | 0.4473 | 1.4236 | 1.3223 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | Lake Superior State | D1 | CCHA | SR | 32 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 0.531 |
| 2021-22 | Lake Superior State | D1 | CCHA | JR | 24 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 0.917 |
| 2020-21 | Lake Superior State | D1 | WCHA | SO | 28 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 0.536 |
| 2019-20 | Minnesota Duluth | D1 | NCHC | FR | 12 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.167 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.