← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Puricelli Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-02-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 50 5 9 14 0.280 0.1079 0.1147 0.4080 0.4338
2016-17 NAHL 52 14 15 29 0.558 0.1981 0.2027 0.5855 0.5990
2017-18 Omaha Lancers USHL 10 0 1 1 0.100 0.0590 0.0556 0.2946 0.2776
2018-19 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 59 30 50 80 1.356 0.4816 0.4473 1.4236 1.3223
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA SR 32 6 11 17 0.531
2021-22 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA JR 24 13 9 22 0.917
2020-21 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA SO 28 8 7 15 0.536
2019-20 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC FR 12 1 1 2 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2019-20 · Minnesota Duluth
-33.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12078
Forward overall
#550
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2001-02
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2000-01
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2024-25
1.454 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.