IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Erickson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-05-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Wellington Dukes OJHL 41 4 3 7 0.171 0.0418 0.0424 0.1168 0.1186
2013-14 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 13 2 0 2 0.154 0.0377 0.0364 0.1053 0.1015
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Gustavus Adolphus D1 — SR 25 10 10 20 0.800
2018-19 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 25 10 10 20 0.800
2017-18 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 23 8 8 16 0.696
2016-17 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SO 21 7 2 9 0.429
2015-16 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC FR 25 5 5 10 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2015-16 · Gustavus Adolphus
+1104.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#57767
Forward overall
#2477
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hunter Fraser
Nichols · 2017-18
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Owen Dean
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2021-22
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Scovill
Wisconsin-Stout · 2006-07
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.