← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christophe Fillion Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-06-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Janesville Jets NAHL 18 2 4 6 0.333 0.1225 0.1338
2018-19 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 51 18 17 35 0.686 0.2644 0.2719 0.9988 1.0273
2019-20 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 49 14 22 36 0.735 0.4334 0.4334 2.2066 2.2066
2020-21 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 6 1 4 5 0.833 0.4916 0.4916 2.5027 2.5027
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Miami D1 NCHC 34 4 6 10 0.294
2023-24 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC SR 39 12 7 19 0.487
2022-23 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC JR 41 7 13 20 0.488
2021-22 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC SO 19 0 4 4 0.210
2020-21 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC FR 25 6 5 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2020-21 · Quinnipiac
+137.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14587
Forward overall
#617
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Vermont (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Michigan
0.25 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Cornell (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2007-08
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2021-22
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2021-22
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.