IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adrian Holesinsky Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-02-11 Country: Slovakia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Västerås IK U20 SHL-J20 8 0 1 1 0.125 0.0695 0.0723 0.1666 0.1734
2015-16 Janesville Jets NAHL 26 9 21 30 1.154 0.4239 0.4147 1.2178 1.1913
2016-17 Janesville Jets NAHL 30 11 25 36 1.200 0.4409 0.4074 1.2666 1.1702
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 7 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 8 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#6428
Forward overall
#305
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jared Docking
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2008-09
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Galati
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
1.241 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brady Fleurent
University of New England · 2014-15
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.