← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gabe Gauer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-09-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Armstrong/Cooper High USHS-MN 22 1 3 4 0.182 0.0224 0.0218 0.0442 0.0431
2016-17 NA3HL 47 5 12 17 0.362 0.0400 0.0397
2017-18 Skipjacks Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 44 9 13 22 0.500 0.0564 0.0535 0.1701 0.1614
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Lawrence D3 NCHA SR 13 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Lawrence D3 NCHA JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Lawrence D1 ECAC SO 25 0 1 1 0.040
2019-20 Lawrence D3 NCHA SO 25 0 1 1 0.040
2018-19 Lawrence D1 ECAC FR 22 0 2 2 0.091
2018-19 Lawrence D3 NCHA FR 22 0 2 2 0.091
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2018-19 · Lawrence
+100.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15110
Defenseman overall
#2183
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2004-05
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2014-15
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Albertus Magnus · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.