← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Herpy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-08-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Elite 31 3 6 9 0.290 0.0216 0.0226 0.0665 0.0695
2017-18 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 40 4 15 19 0.475 0.0536 0.0535 0.1616 0.1613
2018-19 Caledon Admirals OJHL 54 2 20 22 0.407 0.0999 0.0929 0.2789 0.2593
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC GR 25 1 1 2 0.080
2022-23 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC SR 25 0 3 3 0.120
2021-22 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC JR 21 0 5 5 0.238
2020-21 Albertus Magnus D1 SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Albertus Magnus D1 FR 15 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC FR 15 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14485
Defenseman overall
#2274
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hamilton · 2018-19
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2018-19
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2013-14
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.