← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joseph Dunlap Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-11-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Central Illinois Flying Aces USHL 61 12 12 24 0.393 0.2321 0.2279 1.1815 1.1600
2019-20 Fargo Force USHL 48 11 17 28 0.583 0.3441 0.3441 1.7519 1.7519
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Ohio State D1 BigTen GR 39 8 14 22 0.564
2023-24 Ohio State D1 BigTen SR 13 3 5 8 0.615
2022-23 Ohio State D1 BigTen JR 40 13 9 22 0.550
2021-22 Ohio State D1 BigTen SO 32 7 6 13 0.406
2020-21 Ohio State D1 BigTen FR 17 1 0 1 0.059
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2020-21 · Ohio State
-69.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15164
Forward overall
#710
Forward born in 1999
#1459
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2009-10
1.044 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
1.044 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.