| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | Penticton Vees | BCHL | 54 | 2 | 16 | 18 | 0.333 | 0.1242 | 0.1423 | 0.4857 | 0.5567 |
| 2018-19 | Chicago Steel | USHL | 60 | 2 | 17 | 19 | 0.317 | 0.1947 | 0.2089 | 0.9331 | 1.0012 |
| 2019-20 | Chicago Steel | USHL | 45 | 2 | 17 | 19 | 0.422 | 0.2595 | 0.2595 | 1.2439 | 1.2439 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | New Hampshire | D1 | HockeyEast | — | 35 | 1 | 11 | 12 | 0.343 |
| 2023-24 | New Hampshire | D1 | HockeyEast | — | 36 | 1 | 15 | 16 | 0.444 |
| 2022-23 | New Hampshire | D1 | HockeyEast | — | 35 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.143 |
| 2021-22 | New Hampshire | D1 | HockeyEast | SO | 34 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 0.235 |
| 2020-21 | New Hampshire | D1 | HockeyEast | FR | 22 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 0.364 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.