← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Reid Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-09-26 Country: USA
2020 NHL Draft Round 6, Pick #166  ·  Nashville Predators Nashville Predators
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Penticton Vees BCHL 54 2 16 18 0.333 0.1242 0.1423 0.4857 0.5567
2018-19 Chicago Steel USHL 60 2 17 19 0.317 0.1947 0.2089 0.9331 1.0012
2019-20 Chicago Steel USHL 45 2 17 19 0.422 0.2595 0.2595 1.2439 1.2439
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast 35 1 11 12 0.343
2023-24 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast 36 1 15 16 0.444
2022-23 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast 35 0 5 5 0.143
2021-22 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast SO 34 3 5 8 0.235
2020-21 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast FR 22 3 5 8 0.364
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2020-21 · New Hampshire
+111.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6184
Defenseman overall
#1376
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Northland
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trinity · 2014-15
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2004-05
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Augsburg · 2014-15
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.