← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyler Grundy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-04-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 58 14 20 34 0.586 0.2154 0.2335 0.6187 0.6705
2018-19 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 56 5 12 17 0.304 0.1791 0.1793 0.9118 0.9128
2019-20 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 48 11 21 32 0.667 0.3933 0.3933 2.0024 2.0024
2020-21 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 43 5 12 17 0.395 0.2332 0.2332 1.1872 1.1872
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC SR 19 3 3 6 0.316
2023-24 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC JR 28 12 19 31 1.107
2022-23 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC SO 15 2 4 6 0.400
2021-22 St. Thomas D1 CCHA 31 7 5 12 0.387
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2021-22 · St. Thomas
+125.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17691
Forward overall
#788
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Army (0.91 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Amherst · 2010-11
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2020-21
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2024-25
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.