IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Suchy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-03-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 52 5 10 15 0.288 0.1060 0.1097 0.3045 0.3152
2019-20 — NAHL 50 11 27 38 0.760 0.2792 0.2792 0.8022 0.8022
2020-21 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 51 13 16 29 0.569 0.2089 0.2089 0.6002 0.6002
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 27 15 14 29 1.074
2023-24 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 24 8 7 15 0.625
2022-23 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SO 19 2 2 4 0.210
2021-22 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC FR 22 4 3 7 0.318
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2021-22 · Gustavus Adolphus
+238.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24314
Forward overall
#1147
Forward born in 2000
#1902
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan McMurphy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brad Hawkinson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manny Gialedakis
SUNY Oswego · 2010-11
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tristan Fasig
Hobart · 2018-19
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Roethke
Concordia · 2020-21
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.