← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Brow Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-04-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Austin Bruins NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Toledo Cherokee USPHL-Premier 40 6 28 34 0.850 0.0959 0.0959 0.2892 0.2892
2021-22 Protec Jr. Ducks EHL 45 10 28 38 0.844 0.1235 0.1188 0.4140 0.3984
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Adrian ACHA_D1 35 1 11 12 0.343
2024-25 Adrian ACHA_D1 35 1 11 12 0.343
2024-25 SUNY Brockport D3 JR 8 0 2 2 0.250
2023-24 Adrian ACHA_D1 35 1 11 12 0.343
2023-24 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC SO 24 2 0 2 0.083
2022-23 Adrian ACHA_D1 35 1 11 12 0.343
2022-23 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC FR 20 1 5 6 0.300
2021-22 Adrian ACHA_D1 35 1 11 12 0.343
2020-21 Adrian ACHA_D1 35 1 11 12 0.343

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3287
Defenseman overall
#759
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2015-16
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.