IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cole Beilke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-09-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 46 1 9 10 0.217 0.0772 0.0772 0.2282 0.2282
2020-21 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 46 1 11 12 0.261 0.0927 0.0927 0.2739 0.2739
2021-22 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 57 1 13 14 0.246 0.0872 0.0838 0.2579 0.2477
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SR 27 4 14 18 0.667
2024-25 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA JR 23 3 4 7 0.304
2023-24 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SO 27 2 13 15 0.556
2022-23 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA FR 25 3 9 12 0.480
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2022-23 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+506.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17530
Defenseman overall
#2796
Defenseman born in 2001
#5356
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Wandmacher
Saint John's · 2022-23
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Baird
St. Scholastica · 2005-06
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Spethmann
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.414 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.