← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Hubbarde Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-04-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.1226 0.1359 0.3443 0.3815
2017-18 North York Rangers OJHL 36 6 8 14 0.389 0.0953 0.1010 0.2678 0.2839
2018-19 OJHL 34 3 11 14 0.412 0.1009 0.1020 0.2835 0.2867
2019-20 Langley Rivermen BCHL 35 10 16 26 0.743 0.2862 0.2862 1.0811 1.0811
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA 30 13 10 23 0.767
2023-24 Providence D1 HockeyEast 13 1 0 1 0.077
2022-23 Dartmouth D1 ECAC 30 5 11 16 0.533
2021-22 Dartmouth D1 ECAC 22 6 6 12 0.545
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2021-22 · Dartmouth
+527.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29720
Forward overall
#1476
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2015-16
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2015-16
0.650 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.