← New Search ↗ Social Card

Spencer Bellina Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-07-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Northeast Generals NAHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 33 3 11 14 0.424 0.0980 0.0980 0.3430 0.3430
2021-22 NAHL 54 3 16 19 0.352 0.1250 0.1194 0.3695 0.3529
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SR 26 5 8 13 0.500
2024-25 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC JR 17 0 8 8 0.471
2023-24 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SO 27 1 4 5 0.185
2022-23 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 25 0 3 3 0.120
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2022-23 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+6.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8026
Defenseman overall
#1667
Defenseman born in 2001
#2884
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England · 2017-18
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2021-22
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2007-08
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.