← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam Fraser Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-07-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Kindersley Klippers SJHL 38 3 3 6 0.158 0.0405 0.0425 0.1170 0.1226
2019-20 Kindersley Klippers SJHL 56 30 19 49 0.875 0.2242 0.2242 0.6485 0.6485
2020-21 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 56 16 19 35 0.625 0.2220 0.2220 0.6562 0.6562
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 31 21 23 44 1.419
2023-24 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 29 17 27 44 1.517
2022-23 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 28 16 19 35 1.250
2021-22 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 30 24 23 47 1.567
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.57
2021-22 · St. Norbert
+4204.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26852
Forward overall
#1288
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Augsburg · 2005-06
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.