← New Search ↗ Social Card

William Lawson-Body Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-04-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Grand Forks Central (N.D.) USHS-MN 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.0633 0.0633 0.1215 0.1215
2020-21 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 56 7 22 29 0.518 0.1903 0.1903 0.5466 0.5466
2021-22 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 53 13 41 54 1.019 0.3743 0.3702 1.0754 1.0637
2022-23 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 52 16 32 48 0.923 0.3391 0.3187 0.9743 0.9158
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA JR 13 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA 31 2 3 5 0.161
2023-24 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA 10 1 4 5 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2023-24 · Alaska Fairbanks
+72.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12340
Forward overall
#610
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Arcadia · 2021-22
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2017-18
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Framingham State · 2016-17
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.