← New Search ↗ Social Card

William Lawson-Body Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-04-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Grand Forks Central (N.D.) USHS-MN 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.0616 0.0616 0.1215 0.1215
2020-21 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 56 7 22 29 0.518 0.1840 0.1840 0.5437 0.5437
2021-22 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 53 13 41 54 1.019 0.3619 0.3580 1.0697 1.0581
2022-23 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 52 16 32 48 0.923 0.3279 0.3082 0.9692 0.9110
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA JR 13 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Alaska Fairbanks D1 31 2 3 5 0.161
2023-24 Alaska Fairbanks D1 10 1 4 5 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2023-24 · Alaska Fairbanks
+78.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12262
Forward overall
#603
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Framingham State · 2016-17
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia (WI) · 2012-13
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.