IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Whitmore Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-05-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 30 3 3 6 0.200 0.0735 0.0735 0.2114 0.2114
2021-22 — NAHL 33 5 4 9 0.273 0.1002 0.0996 0.2882 0.2864
2022-23 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hamline D3 MIAC GR 6 0 1 1 0.167
2024-25 Hamline D3 MIAC SR 14 2 1 3 0.214
2023-24 Hamline D3 MIAC JR 5 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31340
Forward overall
#1860
Forward born in 2002
#2880
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jacob McPartland
Saint John's · 2022-23
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bailey Conklin
Canton · 2017-18
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
C.J. Valerian
Hobart · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.