IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eamon Doheny Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-01-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Deerfield Academy NE-Prep 27 8 10 18 0.667 0.1344 0.1344 0.3051 0.3051
2019-20 Deerfield Academy NE-Prep 26 5 9 14 0.538 0.1086 0.1086 0.2465 0.2465
2020-21 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 23 0 6 6 0.261 0.0969 0.0969 0.2762 0.2762
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Trinity D3 NESCAC SR 25 5 4 9 0.360
2023-24 Trinity D3 NESCAC JR 30 2 9 11 0.367
2022-23 Trinity D3 NESCAC SO 21 4 3 7 0.333
2021-22 Trinity D3 NESCAC FR 22 1 3 4 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2021-22 · Trinity
+61.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
80%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14257
Defenseman overall
#1893
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Derek Smith
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Grabowski
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Princeton (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wyatt Trumbley
Westfield State · 2012-13
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Haines
SUNY Cortland · 2005-06
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Santiago
Utica · 2007-08
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.