IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Ramsey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-06-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 37 3 11 14 0.378 0.2110 0.2110 0.3060 0.3060
2020-21 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.1321 0.1321 0.3499 0.3499
2021-22 Anchorage Wolverines NAHL 51 4 9 13 0.255 0.1010 0.1010 0.2676 0.2675
2022-23 Anchorage Wolverines NAHL 53 4 17 21 0.396 0.1570 0.1493 0.4160 0.3955
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 Air Force D1 AHA SR 36 23 25 48 1.333
2005-06 Air Force D1 AHA JR 31 7 16 23 0.742
2004-05 Air Force D1 AHA SO 36 11 14 25 0.694
2003-04 Air Force D1 AHA FR 34 8 9 17 0.500

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10497
Defenseman overall
#2228
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Falanga
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2016-17
0.579 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Manning
Anna Maria · 2017-18
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Derton
St. Norbert · 2002-03
0.633 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.