IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eric Charpentier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-06-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Frederick Gunn NE-Prep 35 3 6 9 0.257 0.0509 0.0509 0.1171 0.1171
2020-21 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 58 2 18 20 0.345 0.1267 0.1265 0.3639 0.3633
2022-23 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 53 9 25 34 0.641 0.2357 0.2237 0.6771 0.6427
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Dartmouth D1 ECAC JR 35 4 9 13 0.371
2024-25 Dartmouth D1 ECAC SR 33 3 8 11 0.333
2023-24 Dartmouth D1 ECAC JR 32 4 7 11 0.344
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.34
2023-24 · Dartmouth
+97.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

70%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8323
Defenseman overall
#1891
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Devin Stuermer
Marian · 2011-12
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Giorgio
Bethel · 2018-19
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Gobel
Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.